We Must Respect Jury’s Decision

Dan Dewoskin • Dec 19, 2008

Daily Report – Friday, December 19, 2008

Letter: We must respect jury’s decision

By Dan DeWoskin

First, let me say that I wish to address the concerns held by many prosecutors, legislators and others in the wake of the Brian Nichols verdict that the burden of achieving a recommendation of death in capital cases is too high. I do not intend toassert any opinions as to the constitutionality, legitimacy or ethical considerations regarding the death penalty. I simply feelcompelled to respond to the increasing distrust of and contempt for the discretion of Georgia juries.

In recent years, we have seen tort reform legislation limiting the discretion of juries in many civil actions. Now, because a jury convicted Nichols unanimously but failed to unanimously agree to a recommendation of death, many prosecutors like J.David McDade and Paul L. Howard Jr. are advocating for legislation that would alleviate the requirement of unanimity for are commendation of death in such cases.As I have said, I am not writing this as an opponent of the death penalty. Instead, I am writing this as an advocate of our Georgia jurors. Without question, what makes the American judicial system the best in the world is that, at the end of the day,we trust the enlightened conscience of impartial juries to tell us what Justice is. Now, because of the extremely egregious circumstances of the Nichols case and the fact that he appears to have avoided paying for his crimes with his life, many in our community want to further restrict the trust we place in juries.

McDade is quoted to have said that “the problem occurs when jurors say one thing in voir dire then do another thing in thejury room.” As an attorney who has handled both civil and criminal trials, I wholeheartedly understand the frustration expressed by these words.  I can recall several instances where I have been taken aback by the verdicts returned by juries and their reasoning. However, unless McDade is arguing that we should polygraph each and every prospective juror, the process of voir dire is the best and only means we have procuring fair and impartial jurors.In my experience, the state has often benefited from jurors who have perhaps said one thing during voir dire and then actedin direct contradiction during deliberations. Yet this is why we place prospective jurors under oath. This is why judges,attorneys and parties must never underestimate the importance of the voir dire process. Changing the law to restrict thediscretion of juries is insulting to the service provided by these citizens.

Aside from reducing the requirement that a recommendation of death be unanimous to a 10-2 or 9-3 verdict, other suggestions to “improve” our criminal justice system include giving prosecutors extra “strikes” to disqualify prospective jurors when a certain number of prospective jurors indicate they have serious reservations about the death penalty. Voir direis not about selecting jurors who will convict, acquit or find for the plaintiff or defendant. It is about excluding jurors whocannot listen to all of the evidence and return a verdict that is not compromised by bias and prejudice.

It is troubling that because of their dissatisfaction in the verdict in this case, many feel that we should change the rules. Thejurors in the Nichols case did their job. They listened, they deliberated and they told us what Justice is. For all of us whowere not jurors, we are entitled to our opinions, but we must respect the opinion of our fellow citizens who served on thatjury.

By Dan Dewoskin 09 Mar, 2020
Our firm has recently been hired by several different clients involved in car accidents, in which immediately after the accident, our client called the police. While waiting for police to arrive, the at-fault driver provided our client a copy of his or her insurance information, allowed our client to take a photo of their driver’s […]
By Dan Dewoskin 17 Feb, 2020
The number of hit and run accidents that take place in metro Atlanta is staggering.  We see clients far more often than we would expect after car wrecks where the other driver takes off into the night.  Sometimes, these wrecks are minor, but often, they involve serious collisions with no other driver in sight when […]
By Dan Dewoskin 27 Jan, 2020
If you have had a driver’s license for any significant amount of time, the chances are you have been in some sort of car accident or collision in the past.  It may have been something minor, or perhaps a more serious wreck where you were injured and recovery took more time and treatment than you […]
By Dan Dewoskin 31 Dec, 2019
If you are injured as a result of another person’s negligence, you are entitled under Georgia law to recover all damages that flow from that injury. Typically, this is referred to as a personal injury claim. In Georgia, especially in the metro Atlanta area, many personal injury claims result from car wrecks. So, what happens […]
By Dan Dewoskin 04 Dec, 2019
You have heard all the nightmare stories about people who do not carry uninsured motorist (UM) coverage.  You have read the articles or listened to personal details of Georgians who were rear ended by drunk drivers whose licenses were suspended at the time of the accident, or perhaps people who were hit by someone driving […]
By Dan Dewoskin 06 Nov, 2019
If you are considering filing a personal injury lawsuit as a result of being injured in a car wreck or any other incident in which you are injured as a result of another person’s negligence, it is likely you will be questioned by opposing counsel in a deposition. Any number of people may be deposed […]
By Dan Dewoskin 16 Oct, 2019
Most Georgia drivers are now aware of the law that took effect in 2018 making it illegal to text or operate a cellphone or similar device while driving.  O.C.G.A. § 40-6-241 makes it illegal to even “physically hold or support, with any part of the body” a wireless communications device.  It should go without saying […]
By Dan Dewoskin 25 Sep, 2019
In Georgia, it is illegal to drive a motor vehicle without auto insurance in the amount of at least $25,000.00. Keep in mind that the auto insurance you carry protects your assets in the event you cause a collision. But what if you are injured in a wreck caused by someone else, and the at-fault […]
By Dan Dewoskin 09 Aug, 2019
Where a crime takes place in Georgia, and most places, is an extremely important question.  Yesterday, the Gwinnett County Solicitor General announced that the prosecutors will not prosecute marijuana possession cases with arrest dates of May 10, 2019 or after due to a law change that pertains to THC levels. https://www.wsbtv.com/news/local/gwinnett-county/this-metro-county-will-not-prosecute-any-more-marijuana-cases-for-now/974261373. In essence, it is now […]
By Dan Dewoskin 01 Aug, 2019
Bank of America and American Express are first party debt collectors, meaning that if and when they file suit against you, they are the original lenders seeking to collect their own debts.  Thus, these are often tougher cases to beat in court.  However, before agreeing to settle or pay even a first party debt, there […]
More Posts

Why wait any longer? Request a free quote at 404-987-0026!

Share by: